Judging The Morality Of

JUDGING THE MORALITY OF AN ACTION 1.0 Introduction When a person performs or fails to perform a honorablely significant performance, a particular kind of response is warranted. It could either be cheers or blame.1 The most basic question in piety is; how do I know what is right? Ordinarily speaking, lovable transactions are straight forward and show personal preferences. Aristotle (384323 BCE) seems to beat been the first to construct an explicit theory of moral responsibility.2 Summarily, moral judgment can either be subjective or physical objective; a priori or a posteriori. The basic factors to rouse are; Intention, Circumstance and Con sequence. 2.0 Considering the Intention of an Action The morality of an action is judged on the account of the freedom of man. This freedom presupposes choice. Intention therefore, is the want or anticipated result of an action as willed and foreseen by the agent.3 It is that (object) about which the choice is concerned.4 This could be immediate or remote, direct or indirect.
One could say that an action is good, if! the object behind it is good and vice versa. Joseph Omeregbe however argues that an action should be considered wrong if the consequence (result) turn out bad, the good objective not withstanding.5 3.0 Considering the Circumstances and the Consequences of an Action: 3.1 Deontology:...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay