The Dangers of Objectification

Consider for a moment the course typically interpreted in a class treatment. A soul states that he is an egoist, or a relativist, or an absolutist. These various terms ar employ to classify an individual according to his moral philosophy. Nietzsche has an all-important(prenominal) objection to these simple commentarys. Shall we still speak this expression directly? whitethorn we do so? (Nietzsche 463) There are difficulties in this simplistic approach to classifying an individual. The first is that an individual is not so good crammed into a verbal box. Sartre would say that this is a way of objectifying the person under consideration. To say that I am an egoist, or that another(prenominal) student is an altruist, is to imply that egoism or altruism is the innate nature of the person, and that other considerations fade into the background and become worthless under this veil of the persons ethical philosophy. It is to study me with egoism, or to equate the other stud ent with relativism. But I am to a greater extent than bob the egoist; I am also curtsy the philosopher, I am pier the student, I am Bob the coffee berry drinker. The name Bob points to a definition that is, of necessity, abbreviated. When a eerie asks me who I am, it is not possible for me to provide a spot description.

But when I describe a few opinions, actions, and relationships, I do so hoping that she may befool me beyond the particularise limits imposed by what I nooky tell her quickly. It may be convenient to say, But for this discussion we consider only(prenominal) your ethical theory. But besides objectifying the indi vidual, this is overly simplistic because it! ignores the pernicious shades of meaning which exist among these philosophies. I hypothesise of myself as an egoist because I believe... If you want to get a effective essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay