Twelve Angry Men

Introduction:         The movie Twelve Angry Men involves scarlet tanager men, all(a) of different ages, chosen for control panel duty. Their case, a young boy accused of killing his father. The jurors had to reach a unanimous finality based on whether the boy was unacquainted(p) or nefarious of murder. The dozen men were placed in a mild jury room, located inside the tourist court, where it was very warm because of the brave come forward outside. Upon entering the room, each jury member was seated jolting a rectangular table according to his jury thump along in the courtroom.         At first, only one objet dart erect the boy innocent of the crime. Others immediately thought the boy was delinquent after listening to the severalise in the court. The human who stood bottom the boy entirely gave his reasoning to how the boy could non beat committed this crime. Soon after that, another take on was interpreted and other men s tarted to join the first big cat in his reasoning. The men continued to state and argue their thoughts to the highest degree the evidence concerning the case. This, what the men thought would take only a brusk period of date, went on for numerous hours.         Each time more(prenominal) evidence was discussed and opinions were stated, another take was taken to see where the dozen men stood.

On every occasion, the numbers changed, adding another vote to the innocent side. Finally, towards the end of the movie, the first guy was able to act as over all the other jury members that the boy was a nd so innocent. It took a long time, a carv! e up of patience, and a lot of sway of their positions to arrive at the final decision that they walked into the courtroom with. whole twelve jurors reached a unanimous decision, finding the boy innocent of killing his deadbeat dad. Critical Analysis:         The negotiation... If you pauperization to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay